Wimbledon vs Vauxhall
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Vauxhall scores higher overall, though Wimbledon may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Wimbledonwinner
MertonVauxhall
LambethVauxhall is £250/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Vauxhall
A central, transport-heavy riverside area with new-build flats, nightlife pockets, and quick Victoria line access.
- ✓Victoria line and rail interchange
- ✓Walk or cycle to Westminster and the South Bank
- ✓Modern flats and gyms
- →Roads and junctions dominate the centre
- →Can feel anonymous
- →Prices are high around new developments
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Vauxhall better to live in?
Vauxhall scores higher overall, though Wimbledon may offer better affordability.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Vauxhall?
Wimbledon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,700 vs £1,950 in Vauxhall, a saving of £250/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Vauxhall?
Vauxhall scores higher for transport (10/10 vs 7/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Vauxhall is served by Vauxhall.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →