Wimbledon vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Rent comparison
Wimbledon
MertonKingstonwinner
Kingston upon ThamesWimbledon is £250/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Kingston better to live in?
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Kingston?
Kingston is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,450 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £250/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Kingston?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 5/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →