Wimbledon vs Kilburn
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kilburn.
Rent comparison
Wimbledon
MertonKilburnwinner
BrentWimbledon is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Kilburn
A diverse, busy north-west high street with Jubilee and Overground access and better value than neighbouring Hampstead pockets.
- ✓Jubilee line is useful for central and Canary Wharf
- ✓Good value compared with nearby NW areas
- ✓Diverse food and pubs
- →High street can feel hectic
- →Street quality varies block by block
- →Less polished than West Hampstead
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Kilburn better to live in?
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kilburn.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Kilburn?
Kilburn is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,500 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Kilburn?
Kilburn scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 7/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Kilburn is served by Kilburn.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →