Wimbledon vs Herne Hill
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Herne Hill.
Rent comparison
Wimbledon
MertonHerne Hillwinner
LambethWimbledon is £100/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Herne Hill
A green, village-like south London pocket between Brockwell Park and Dulwich.
- ✓Brockwell Park and lido nearby
- ✓Good Sunday market and cafes
- ✓Calmer than Brixton while still close
- →Mostly rail-led commuting
- →Limited nightlife
- →Small rental market
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Herne Hill better to live in?
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Herne Hill.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Herne Hill?
Herne Hill is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £100/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Herne Hill?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Herne Hill is served by Herne Hill.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →