Wimbledon vs Hampstead
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Wimbledonwinner
MertonHampstead
CamdenHampstead is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Hampstead
Heath-side north London with village streets, old pubs, and some of the highest rents outside Zone 1.
- ✓Hampstead Heath is the main draw
- ✓Quiet village centre with strong cafes and pubs
- ✓Northern line keeps central commutes manageable
- →Very expensive for rooms and flats
- →Nightlife is limited
- →Hilly streets and older housing stock
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Hampstead better to live in?
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Hampstead?
Wimbledon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,700 vs £2,000 in Hampstead, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Hampstead?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Hampstead is served by Hampstead.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →