Wimbledon vs Hammersmith
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though Wimbledon may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Wimbledonwinner
MertonHammersmith
Hammersmith & FulhamHammersmith is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Hammersmith
Four tube lines, the river, and quick access to Heathrow. Functional more than charming.
- ✓Four tube lines from one station
- ✓Thames Path and riverside pubs
- ✓Quick to Heathrow
- →Town centre feels dated
- →Less character than east-London peers
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Hammersmith better to live in?
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though Wimbledon may offer better affordability.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Hammersmith?
Wimbledon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,700 vs £1,850 in Hammersmith, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Hammersmith?
Hammersmith scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 7/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Hammersmith is served by Hammersmith.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →