Wimbledon vs Fulham
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Wimbledonwinner
MertonFulham
Hammersmith & FulhamFulham is £250/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Fulham
A polished south-west professional area with riverside pockets, gyms, pubs, and District line commuting.
- ✓Strong young-professional base
- ✓Good pubs, gyms, and brunch
- ✓Riverside and park access
- →Pricey for a single-line area
- →Can feel socially narrow
- →District line commutes can be slow
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Fulham better to live in?
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Fulham?
Wimbledon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,700 vs £1,950 in Fulham, a saving of £250/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Fulham?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Fulham is served by Fulham Broadway.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →