Wimbledon vs Forest Hill
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Forest Hill.
Rent comparison
Wimbledon
MertonForest Hillwinner
LewishamWimbledon is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Forest Hill
Leafy Overground living with views, the Horniman Museum, and better value than nearby Dulwich villages.
- ✓Horniman Museum and gardens
- ✓Overground connection
- ✓Good value for green south-east London
- →Hilly streets
- →Slower to west London
- →Nightlife is limited
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Forest Hill better to live in?
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Forest Hill.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Forest Hill?
Forest Hill is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,500 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Forest Hill?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Forest Hill is served by Forest Hill.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →