Wimbledon vs Cricklewood
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Cricklewood.
Rent comparison
Wimbledon
MertonCricklewoodwinner
BrentWimbledon is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Cricklewood better to live in?
Wimbledon scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Cricklewood.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Cricklewood?
Cricklewood is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Cricklewood?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →