Wimbledon vs Belsize Park
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Wimbledonwinner
MertonBelsize Park
CamdenBelsize Park is £250/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Belsize Park
A calmer, well-kept pocket between Primrose Hill and Hampstead, with a residential feel and premium pricing.
- ✓Excellent access to parks and Hampstead Heath
- ✓Attractive streets and mansion blocks
- ✓Good cafes without Camden-level crowds
- →High cost for limited nightlife
- →Northern line is the main tube option
- →Less social energy than nearby Camden
Frequently asked questions
Is Wimbledon or Belsize Park better to live in?
Wimbledon offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Wimbledon cheaper than Belsize Park?
Wimbledon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,700 vs £1,950 in Belsize Park, a saving of £250/month.
Which has better transport — Wimbledon or Belsize Park?
Wimbledon scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon. Belsize Park is served by Belsize Park.
Compare Wimbledon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →