Walthamstow vs Wimbledon
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Walthamstow offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Walthamstowwinner
Waltham ForestWimbledon
MertonWimbledon is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Walthamstow
Surprisingly good value, with a fast Victoria-line tube and the longest street market in Europe.
- ✓Direct Victoria line into central London
- ✓Significantly cheaper than Zone 2 east
- ✓Lots of green space (Walthamstow Wetlands)
- →Quiet evenings
- →Far from the City by transit
Wimbledon
Suburban, leafy, family-friendly — and home to one of the biggest urban commons in the world.
- ✓Wimbledon Common
- ✓Safe, quiet streets
- ✓Fast rail into Waterloo
- →Quiet at night
- →Slower journeys to East London
Frequently asked questions
Is Walthamstow or Wimbledon better to live in?
Walthamstow offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Walthamstow cheaper than Wimbledon?
Walthamstow is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,700 in Wimbledon, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Walthamstow or Wimbledon?
Walthamstow and Wimbledon score equally on transport (7/10). Walthamstow is served by Walthamstow Central. Wimbledon is served by Wimbledon.
Compare Walthamstow with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →