Walthamstow vs Uxbridge
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Walthamstow scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Uxbridge.
Rent comparison
Walthamstow
Waltham ForestUxbridgewinner
HillingdonWalthamstow is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Walthamstow
Surprisingly good value, with a fast Victoria-line tube and the longest street market in Europe.
- ✓Direct Victoria line into central London
- ✓Significantly cheaper than Zone 2 east
- ✓Lots of green space (Walthamstow Wetlands)
- →Quiet evenings
- →Far from the City by transit
Uxbridge
Far-west affordability with Metropolitan/Piccadilly terminus links and a large town-centre offer.
- ✓Low rents for west London
- ✓Two tube lines
- ✓Large retail and student-influenced amenities
- →Long central commute
- →Feels separate from inner London
- →Outer-zone travel costs
Frequently asked questions
Is Walthamstow or Uxbridge better to live in?
Walthamstow scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Uxbridge.
Is Walthamstow cheaper than Uxbridge?
Uxbridge is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,250 vs £1,400 in Walthamstow, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Walthamstow or Uxbridge?
Walthamstow scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Walthamstow is served by Walthamstow Central. Uxbridge is served by Uxbridge.
Compare Walthamstow with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →