Tottenham vs Hackney Wick
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hackney Wick scores higher overall, though Tottenham may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Tottenhamwinner
HaringeyHackney Wick
HackneyHackney Wick is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Tottenham
Fast Victoria line access at Tottenham Hale, lower rents, and a changing high street with mixed street-by-street feel.
- ✓Victoria line and rail from Tottenham Hale
- ✓Better affordability for north London
- ✓Improving food, breweries, and local projects
- →Variable street feel
- →Less polished public realm
- →Commutes depend heavily on station proximity
Hackney Wick
Canals, studios, breweries, and Olympic Park access, with a creative feel and improving transport.
- ✓Excellent canal and park access
- ✓Creative venues and breweries
- ✓Young social crowd
- →Overground-led commute
- →Patchy late-night transport
- →New-build pricing has risen
Frequently asked questions
Is Tottenham or Hackney Wick better to live in?
Hackney Wick scores higher overall, though Tottenham may offer better affordability.
Is Tottenham cheaper than Hackney Wick?
Tottenham is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,250 vs £1,550 in Hackney Wick, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Tottenham or Hackney Wick?
Tottenham scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Tottenham is served by Tottenham Hale. Hackney Wick is served by Hackney Wick.
Compare Tottenham with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →