Tottenham vs Cricklewood
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Tottenham offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Tottenhamwinner
HaringeyCricklewood
BrentCricklewood is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Tottenham
Fast Victoria line access at Tottenham Hale, lower rents, and a changing high street with mixed street-by-street feel.
- ✓Victoria line and rail from Tottenham Hale
- ✓Better affordability for north London
- ✓Improving food, breweries, and local projects
- →Variable street feel
- →Less polished public realm
- →Commutes depend heavily on station proximity
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Tottenham or Cricklewood better to live in?
Tottenham offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Tottenham cheaper than Cricklewood?
Tottenham is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,250 vs £1,400 in Cricklewood, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Tottenham or Cricklewood?
Tottenham scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Tottenham is served by Tottenham Hale. Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood.
Compare Tottenham with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →