Streatham vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Streatham may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Streathamwinner
LambethEarlsfield
WandsworthEarlsfield is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Streatham
Long, practical, and better-value south London with commons nearby and rail links from several stations.
- ✓Good value for space
- ✓Streatham Common and Tooting Common nearby
- ✓Large everyday high street
- →No tube
- →Traffic-heavy main road
- →Commute depends on which station you live near
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Streatham or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Streatham may offer better affordability.
Is Streatham cheaper than Earlsfield?
Streatham is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,600 in Earlsfield, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Streatham or Earlsfield?
Earlsfield scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 5/10). Streatham is served by Streatham. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Streatham with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →