Stratford vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Stratford offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Stratfordwinner
NewhamEarlsfield
WandsworthLifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Stratford
Olympic legacy regen — high-rises, the largest urban park in Europe, and probably the best-connected station in London.
- ✓Six rail/tube services
- ✓Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park
- ✓Strong gym/leisure infrastructure
- →Feels corporate in places
- →Limited independent food scene
- →Westfield-centric
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Stratford or Earlsfield better to live in?
Stratford offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Stratford cheaper than Earlsfield?
Stratford and Earlsfield have similar rents — both around £1,600/month for a 1-bed flat.
Which has better transport — Stratford or Earlsfield?
Stratford scores higher for transport (10/10 vs 6/10). Stratford is served by Stratford. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Stratford with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →