Stockwell vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Stockwell scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Rent comparison
Stockwell
LambethKingstonwinner
Kingston upon ThamesStockwell is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Stockwell
A compact interchange between Brixton, Vauxhall, and Clapham with Victoria and Northern line access.
- ✓Victoria and Northern lines
- ✓Very good position for south/central commutes
- ✓Lower-key than Brixton or Clapham
- →Fewer destination amenities
- →Some busy road edges
- →Less green than neighbouring commons areas
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Stockwell or Kingston better to live in?
Stockwell scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Is Stockwell cheaper than Kingston?
Kingston is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,450 vs £1,600 in Stockwell, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Stockwell or Kingston?
Stockwell scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 5/10). Stockwell is served by Stockwell. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Stockwell with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →