Stockwell vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Stockwellwinner
LambethEarlsfield
WandsworthLifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Stockwell
A compact interchange between Brixton, Vauxhall, and Clapham with Victoria and Northern line access.
- ✓Victoria and Northern lines
- ✓Very good position for south/central commutes
- ✓Lower-key than Brixton or Clapham
- →Fewer destination amenities
- →Some busy road edges
- →Less green than neighbouring commons areas
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Stockwell or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Stockwell cheaper than Earlsfield?
Stockwell and Earlsfield have similar rents — both around £1,600/month for a 1-bed flat.
Which has better transport — Stockwell or Earlsfield?
Stockwell scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 6/10). Stockwell is served by Stockwell. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Stockwell with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →