Putney vs Barnes
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Putney scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Barnes.
Rent comparison
Putney
WandsworthBarneswinner
Richmond upon ThamesPutney is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Putney
River, Richmond Park nearby, and a clean South-West rail line to Waterloo. Slightly older professional crowd than Clapham.
- ✓Thames Path and rowing on the river
- ✓Easy access to Richmond Park
- ✓Clean residential feel
- →Pricey
- →Slower to East London
Barnes
Riverside village living with commons, pubs, and premium prices for a slower west London rhythm.
- ✓Thames Path and Barnes Common
- ✓Village character
- ✓Quiet, high-quality residential streets
- →Expensive
- →Rail-only commute
- →Very quiet nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Putney or Barnes better to live in?
Putney scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Barnes.
Is Putney cheaper than Barnes?
Barnes is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,800 vs £1,850 in Putney, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Putney or Barnes?
Putney scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 4/10). Putney is served by Putney and East Putney. Barnes is served by Barnes.
Compare Putney with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →