Mile End vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Mile End scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Rent comparison
Mile End
Tower HamletsKingstonwinner
Kingston upon ThamesMile End is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Mile End
A useful east London interchange by the canal, Victoria Park, and student-heavy Queen Mary streets.
- ✓Central, District, and Hammersmith & City lines
- ✓Good parks and canal access
- ✓Quick to City, Stratford, and Canary Wharf
- →Busy roads around the station
- →Student-heavy pockets
- →Not as polished as neighbouring Victoria Park areas
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Mile End or Kingston better to live in?
Mile End scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Kingston.
Is Mile End cheaper than Kingston?
Kingston is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,450 vs £1,500 in Mile End, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Mile End or Kingston?
Mile End scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 5/10). Mile End is served by Mile End. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Mile End with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →