Kingston vs Uxbridge
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Uxbridge offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Kingston
Kingston upon ThamesUxbridgewinner
HillingdonKingston is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Uxbridge
Far-west affordability with Metropolitan/Piccadilly terminus links and a large town-centre offer.
- ✓Low rents for west London
- ✓Two tube lines
- ✓Large retail and student-influenced amenities
- →Long central commute
- →Feels separate from inner London
- →Outer-zone travel costs
Frequently asked questions
Is Kingston or Uxbridge better to live in?
Uxbridge offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Kingston cheaper than Uxbridge?
Uxbridge is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,250 vs £1,450 in Kingston, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Kingston or Uxbridge?
Uxbridge scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 5/10). Kingston is served by Kingston. Uxbridge is served by Uxbridge.
Compare Kingston with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →