Kennington vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Kennington scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Earlsfield.
Rent comparison
Kennington
LambethEarlsfieldwinner
WandsworthKennington is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Kennington
A calmer Zone 1/2 pocket with Georgian streets, Northern line access, and good links to Waterloo and the City.
- ✓Central but more residential than Vauxhall
- ✓Northern line branches
- ✓Good pubs and local streets
- →Limited late-night scene
- →Premium prices for central calm
- →Some road-heavy edges
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Kennington or Earlsfield better to live in?
Kennington scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Earlsfield.
Is Kennington cheaper than Earlsfield?
Earlsfield is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,900 in Kennington, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Kennington or Earlsfield?
Kennington scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Kennington is served by Kennington. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Kennington with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →