Hendon vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Hendon may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Hendonwinner
BarnetEarlsfield
WandsworthEarlsfield is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hendon
Outer-north value with Northern line access, Middlesex University nearby, and practical rather than fashionable amenities.
- ✓Good affordability for north-west London
- ✓Northern line into central London
- ✓Everyday shops and restaurants
- →Longer journeys to east and south London
- →Less nightlife
- →Main roads can feel car-led
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Hendon or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Hendon may offer better affordability.
Is Hendon cheaper than Earlsfield?
Hendon is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,600 in Earlsfield, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Hendon or Earlsfield?
Hendon and Earlsfield score equally on transport (6/10). Hendon is served by Hendon Central. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Hendon with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →