Harrow vs Cricklewood
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Harrow offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Harrowwinner
HarrowCricklewood
BrentCricklewood is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Harrow
A west/north-west hub with Metropolitan line speed, broad shopping, and more affordability than inner west London.
- ✓Fast Metropolitan line to central London
- ✓Strong town-centre amenities
- ✓Better value than Zone 2 west London
- →Outer-zone commute cost
- →Less London village charm
- →Nightlife is limited
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Harrow or Cricklewood better to live in?
Harrow offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Harrow cheaper than Cricklewood?
Harrow is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,350 vs £1,400 in Cricklewood, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Harrow or Cricklewood?
Harrow scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Harrow is served by Harrow-on-the-Hill. Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood.
Compare Harrow with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →