Hammersmith vs Hampstead
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hammersmith offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Hammersmithwinner
Hammersmith & FulhamHampstead
CamdenHampstead is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hammersmith
Four tube lines, the river, and quick access to Heathrow. Functional more than charming.
- ✓Four tube lines from one station
- ✓Thames Path and riverside pubs
- ✓Quick to Heathrow
- →Town centre feels dated
- →Less character than east-London peers
Hampstead
Heath-side north London with village streets, old pubs, and some of the highest rents outside Zone 1.
- ✓Hampstead Heath is the main draw
- ✓Quiet village centre with strong cafes and pubs
- ✓Northern line keeps central commutes manageable
- →Very expensive for rooms and flats
- →Nightlife is limited
- →Hilly streets and older housing stock
Frequently asked questions
Is Hammersmith or Hampstead better to live in?
Hammersmith offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Hammersmith cheaper than Hampstead?
Hammersmith is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,850 vs £2,000 in Hampstead, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Hammersmith or Hampstead?
Hammersmith scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 6/10). Hammersmith is served by Hammersmith. Hampstead is served by Hampstead.
Compare Hammersmith with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →