Hammersmith vs Hackney Wick
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Hackney Wick.
Rent comparison
Hammersmith
Hammersmith & FulhamHackney Wickwinner
HackneyHammersmith is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hammersmith
Four tube lines, the river, and quick access to Heathrow. Functional more than charming.
- ✓Four tube lines from one station
- ✓Thames Path and riverside pubs
- ✓Quick to Heathrow
- →Town centre feels dated
- →Less character than east-London peers
Hackney Wick
Canals, studios, breweries, and Olympic Park access, with a creative feel and improving transport.
- ✓Excellent canal and park access
- ✓Creative venues and breweries
- ✓Young social crowd
- →Overground-led commute
- →Patchy late-night transport
- →New-build pricing has risen
Frequently asked questions
Is Hammersmith or Hackney Wick better to live in?
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Hackney Wick.
Is Hammersmith cheaper than Hackney Wick?
Hackney Wick is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,550 vs £1,850 in Hammersmith, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Hammersmith or Hackney Wick?
Hammersmith scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 6/10). Hammersmith is served by Hammersmith. Hackney Wick is served by Hackney Wick.
Compare Hammersmith with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →