Hammersmith vs Fitzrovia
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hammersmith offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Hammersmithwinner
Hammersmith & FulhamFitzrovia
CamdenFitzrovia is £300/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hammersmith
Four tube lines, the river, and quick access to Heathrow. Functional more than charming.
- ✓Four tube lines from one station
- ✓Thames Path and riverside pubs
- ✓Quick to Heathrow
- →Town centre feels dated
- →Less character than east-London peers
Fitzrovia
Central, walkable, and food-heavy, sitting between Oxford Street, Bloomsbury, and Marylebone.
- ✓Walkable to many central offices
- ✓Excellent restaurants and cafes
- ✓Good balance of quiet streets and central access
- →High rent
- →Limited green space
- →Small rental supply
Frequently asked questions
Is Hammersmith or Fitzrovia better to live in?
Hammersmith offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Hammersmith cheaper than Fitzrovia?
Hammersmith is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,850 vs £2,150 in Fitzrovia, a saving of £300/month.
Which has better transport — Hammersmith or Fitzrovia?
Hammersmith scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 8/10). Hammersmith is served by Hammersmith. Fitzrovia is served by Goodge Street.
Compare Hammersmith with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →