Hammersmith vs Barnes
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Barnes.
Rent comparison
Hammersmith
Hammersmith & FulhamBarneswinner
Richmond upon ThamesHammersmith is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hammersmith
Four tube lines, the river, and quick access to Heathrow. Functional more than charming.
- ✓Four tube lines from one station
- ✓Thames Path and riverside pubs
- ✓Quick to Heathrow
- →Town centre feels dated
- →Less character than east-London peers
Barnes
Riverside village living with commons, pubs, and premium prices for a slower west London rhythm.
- ✓Thames Path and Barnes Common
- ✓Village character
- ✓Quiet, high-quality residential streets
- →Expensive
- →Rail-only commute
- →Very quiet nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Hammersmith or Barnes better to live in?
Hammersmith scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Barnes.
Is Hammersmith cheaper than Barnes?
Barnes is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,800 vs £1,850 in Hammersmith, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Hammersmith or Barnes?
Hammersmith scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 4/10). Hammersmith is served by Hammersmith. Barnes is served by Barnes.
Compare Hammersmith with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →