Hackney Wick vs Forest Hill
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Forest Hill offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Hackney Wick
HackneyForest Hillwinner
LewishamHackney Wick is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hackney Wick
Canals, studios, breweries, and Olympic Park access, with a creative feel and improving transport.
- ✓Excellent canal and park access
- ✓Creative venues and breweries
- ✓Young social crowd
- →Overground-led commute
- →Patchy late-night transport
- →New-build pricing has risen
Forest Hill
Leafy Overground living with views, the Horniman Museum, and better value than nearby Dulwich villages.
- ✓Horniman Museum and gardens
- ✓Overground connection
- ✓Good value for green south-east London
- →Hilly streets
- →Slower to west London
- →Nightlife is limited
Frequently asked questions
Is Hackney Wick or Forest Hill better to live in?
Forest Hill offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Hackney Wick cheaper than Forest Hill?
Forest Hill is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,500 vs £1,550 in Hackney Wick, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Hackney Wick or Forest Hill?
Hackney Wick and Forest Hill score equally on transport (6/10). Hackney Wick is served by Hackney Wick. Forest Hill is served by Forest Hill.
Compare Hackney Wick with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →