Hackney Wick vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Hackney Wick may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Hackney Wickwinner
HackneyEarlsfield
WandsworthEarlsfield is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hackney Wick
Canals, studios, breweries, and Olympic Park access, with a creative feel and improving transport.
- ✓Excellent canal and park access
- ✓Creative venues and breweries
- ✓Young social crowd
- →Overground-led commute
- →Patchy late-night transport
- →New-build pricing has risen
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Hackney Wick or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Hackney Wick may offer better affordability.
Is Hackney Wick cheaper than Earlsfield?
Hackney Wick is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,550 vs £1,600 in Earlsfield, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Hackney Wick or Earlsfield?
Hackney Wick and Earlsfield score equally on transport (6/10). Hackney Wick is served by Hackney Wick. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Hackney Wick with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →