Hackney Wick vs Barnes
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Hackney Wick offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Hackney Wickwinner
HackneyBarnes
Richmond upon ThamesBarnes is £250/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Hackney Wick
Canals, studios, breweries, and Olympic Park access, with a creative feel and improving transport.
- ✓Excellent canal and park access
- ✓Creative venues and breweries
- ✓Young social crowd
- →Overground-led commute
- →Patchy late-night transport
- →New-build pricing has risen
Barnes
Riverside village living with commons, pubs, and premium prices for a slower west London rhythm.
- ✓Thames Path and Barnes Common
- ✓Village character
- ✓Quiet, high-quality residential streets
- →Expensive
- →Rail-only commute
- →Very quiet nightlife
Frequently asked questions
Is Hackney Wick or Barnes better to live in?
Hackney Wick offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Hackney Wick cheaper than Barnes?
Hackney Wick is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,550 vs £1,800 in Barnes, a saving of £250/month.
Which has better transport — Hackney Wick or Barnes?
Hackney Wick scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 4/10). Hackney Wick is served by Hackney Wick. Barnes is served by Barnes.
Compare Hackney Wick with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →