Greenwich vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Greenwich
GreenwichEarlsfieldwinner
WandsworthGreenwich is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Greenwich
Royal park, observatory, market, river — the most picturesque corner of London on a Sunday.
- ✓Greenwich Park and the Royal Observatory
- ✓Riverside walks
- ✓Quick DLR to Canary Wharf
- →Slower journey to West End
- →Quieter evenings
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Greenwich or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Greenwich cheaper than Earlsfield?
Earlsfield is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,650 in Greenwich, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Greenwich or Earlsfield?
Greenwich scores higher for transport (7/10 vs 6/10). Greenwich is served by Greenwich and Cutty Sark. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Greenwich with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →