East Dulwich vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
East Dulwich
SouthwarkEarlsfieldwinner
WandsworthEast Dulwich is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
East Dulwich
Leafy, food-led south-east London with Lordship Lane at its centre and a family/professional mix.
- ✓Strong independent food and pubs
- ✓Good access to Peckham Rye and Dulwich parks
- ✓Attractive residential streets
- →No tube
- →Quieter late-night scene
- →Rents are high for rail-only access
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is East Dulwich or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is East Dulwich cheaper than Earlsfield?
Earlsfield is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,650 in East Dulwich, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — East Dulwich or Earlsfield?
Earlsfield scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 5/10). East Dulwich is served by East Dulwich. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare East Dulwich with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →