Earlsfield vs Twickenham
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Twickenham.
Rent comparison
Earlsfield
WandsworthTwickenhamwinner
Richmond upon ThamesEarlsfield is £100/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Twickenham
Outer south-west value by the river, with rail links, pubs, and rugby-day crowds.
- ✓Good value compared with Richmond
- ✓Riverside walks
- ✓Useful rail to Waterloo
- →Outer-zone commute
- →Quiet outside event days
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Earlsfield or Twickenham better to live in?
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Twickenham.
Is Earlsfield cheaper than Twickenham?
Twickenham is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,500 vs £1,600 in Earlsfield, a saving of £100/month.
Which has better transport — Earlsfield or Twickenham?
Earlsfield scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 5/10). Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield. Twickenham is served by Twickenham.
Compare Earlsfield with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →