Earlsfield vs Chiswick
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Chiswick scores higher overall, though Earlsfield may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Earlsfieldwinner
WandsworthChiswick
HounslowChiswick is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Chiswick
Leafy west London with a strong high road, riverside access, and a calmer professional/family feel.
- ✓Good cafes, pubs, and independent shops
- ✓Close to the Thames and Chiswick House
- ✓District/Piccadilly options at Turnham Green
- →Slower to the City and east London
- →Quiet nightlife
- →Premium west London rents
Frequently asked questions
Is Earlsfield or Chiswick better to live in?
Chiswick scores higher overall, though Earlsfield may offer better affordability.
Is Earlsfield cheaper than Chiswick?
Earlsfield is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,800 in Chiswick, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Earlsfield or Chiswick?
Chiswick scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield. Chiswick is served by Turnham Green.
Compare Earlsfield with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →