Deptford vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Deptford may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Deptfordwinner
LewishamEarlsfield
WandsworthEarlsfield is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Deptford
A creative riverside-adjacent area with markets, studios, and quick rail into London Bridge.
- ✓Good food, markets, and independent venues
- ✓Quick rail to London Bridge
- ✓Lower rents than Greenwich
- →Public realm varies by street
- →Rail-led commute
- →Nightlife is lively but uneven
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Deptford or Earlsfield better to live in?
Earlsfield scores higher overall, though Deptford may offer better affordability.
Is Deptford cheaper than Earlsfield?
Deptford is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,450 vs £1,600 in Earlsfield, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Deptford or Earlsfield?
Deptford and Earlsfield score equally on transport (6/10). Deptford is served by Deptford. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Deptford with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →