Cricklewood vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Kingston scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Cricklewoodwinner
BrentKingston
Kingston upon ThamesKingston is £50/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Cricklewood or Kingston better to live in?
Kingston scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Is Cricklewood cheaper than Kingston?
Cricklewood is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,450 in Kingston, a saving of £50/month.
Which has better transport — Cricklewood or Kingston?
Cricklewood scores higher for transport (6/10 vs 5/10). Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Cricklewood with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →