Cricklewood vs Forest Hill
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Forest Hill scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Cricklewoodwinner
BrentForest Hill
LewishamForest Hill is £100/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Forest Hill
Leafy Overground living with views, the Horniman Museum, and better value than nearby Dulwich villages.
- ✓Horniman Museum and gardens
- ✓Overground connection
- ✓Good value for green south-east London
- →Hilly streets
- →Slower to west London
- →Nightlife is limited
Frequently asked questions
Is Cricklewood or Forest Hill better to live in?
Forest Hill scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Is Cricklewood cheaper than Forest Hill?
Cricklewood is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,500 in Forest Hill, a saving of £100/month.
Which has better transport — Cricklewood or Forest Hill?
Cricklewood and Forest Hill score equally on transport (6/10). Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood. Forest Hill is served by Forest Hill.
Compare Cricklewood with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →