Cricklewood vs Forest Gate
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Forest Gate offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Rent comparison
Cricklewood
BrentForest Gatewinner
NewhamCricklewood is £100/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Forest Gate
Elizabeth line access, Wanstead Flats, and a diverse east London high street at a lower rent point.
- ✓Elizabeth line is a major commute advantage
- ✓Wanstead Flats nearby
- ✓Good value for east London
- →Quieter at night
- →Less dense amenity scene than Hackney
- →Street quality varies
Frequently asked questions
Is Cricklewood or Forest Gate better to live in?
Forest Gate offers better value — similar or better scores at a lower rent.
Is Cricklewood cheaper than Forest Gate?
Forest Gate is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,300 vs £1,400 in Cricklewood, a saving of £100/month.
Which has better transport — Cricklewood or Forest Gate?
Forest Gate scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood. Forest Gate is served by Forest Gate.
Compare Cricklewood with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →