Cricklewood vs Balham
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Balham scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Cricklewoodwinner
BrentBalham
WandsworthBalham is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Cricklewood
A practical north-west option with Thameslink access, lower rents, and improving links around Brent Cross.
- ✓Good value near West Hampstead
- ✓Thameslink access
- ✓Everyday shops and local restaurants
- →Less polished public realm
- →Rail frequency matters more than tube access
- →Limited nightlife
Balham
A dependable south-west professional base with Northern line, rail, gyms, brunch, and access to commons.
- ✓Tube and rail together
- ✓Strong gyms, cafes, and pubs
- ✓Close to Clapham and Wandsworth commons
- →Can feel expensive for its distance out
- →Less distinctive than neighbouring villages
- →Northern line reliance
Frequently asked questions
Is Cricklewood or Balham better to live in?
Balham scores higher overall, though Cricklewood may offer better affordability.
Is Cricklewood cheaper than Balham?
Cricklewood is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,400 vs £1,600 in Balham, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Cricklewood or Balham?
Balham scores higher for transport (8/10 vs 6/10). Cricklewood is served by Cricklewood. Balham is served by Balham.
Compare Cricklewood with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →