Clapham vs Earlsfield
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Clapham scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Earlsfield.
Rent comparison
Clapham
LambethEarlsfieldwinner
WandsworthClapham is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Clapham
The young-professionals-just-out-of-uni capital of London. Common, brunch, gym, rinse, repeat.
- ✓Big crowd of young professionals
- ✓Clapham Common
- ✓Brilliant rail connections via the Junction
- →Can feel cliquey and homogenous
- →Rowdy on weekends
Earlsfield
A quieter Wandsworth option with rail to Waterloo, local pubs, and access to south-west commons.
- ✓Quick rail to Waterloo
- ✓Calmer than Clapham
- ✓Good local pubs and gyms
- →No tube
- →Limited nightlife
- →Can feel expensive for rail-only access
Frequently asked questions
Is Clapham or Earlsfield better to live in?
Clapham scores higher overall, though it comes at a rent premium over Earlsfield.
Is Clapham cheaper than Earlsfield?
Earlsfield is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,600 vs £1,800 in Clapham, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Clapham or Earlsfield?
Clapham scores higher for transport (9/10 vs 6/10). Clapham is served by Clapham Common and Clapham Junction. Earlsfield is served by Earlsfield.
Compare Clapham with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →