Catford vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Kingston scores higher overall, though Catford may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Catfordwinner
LewishamKingston
Kingston upon ThamesKingston is £150/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Catford
Better-value south-east London with rail links, a changing town centre, and access to larger parks.
- ✓Lower rents than many inner south-east areas
- ✓Rail to central London
- ✓Close to Ladywell Fields and Mountsfield Park
- →Town centre is still rough-edged
- →Limited nightlife
- →Commutes are rail-frequency dependent
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Catford or Kingston better to live in?
Kingston scores higher overall, though Catford may offer better affordability.
Is Catford cheaper than Kingston?
Catford is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,300 vs £1,450 in Kingston, a saving of £150/month.
Which has better transport — Catford or Kingston?
Catford and Kingston score equally on transport (5/10). Catford is served by Catford. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Catford with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →