Bexleyheath vs Kingston
A side-by-side comparison of rent, transport, lifestyle and overall liveability.
Our recommendation
Kingston scores higher overall, though Bexleyheath may offer better affordability.
Rent comparison
Bexleyheathwinner
BexleyKingston
Kingston upon ThamesKingston is £200/month cheaper on a 1-bed flat.
Lifestyle comparison
Lively
Green space
Nightlife
Café density
Gym density
Walkability
Food scene
Young professionals
Safety
Transport
Bexleyheath
Outer south-east affordability with a large town centre and rail links into central London.
- ✓Lower rents
- ✓Large shopping centre and everyday amenities
- ✓More space for the money
- →Longer central commute
- →Less young-professional scene
- →Outer-suburban feel
Kingston
Thames-side outer south-west London with a strong town centre, river walks, and more space.
- ✓Large retail and riverside amenities
- ✓Good access to Richmond Park and the Thames
- ✓More space than inner south-west
- →Longer commute into central London
- →Outer-zone travel
- →Less useful for east London jobs
Frequently asked questions
Is Bexleyheath or Kingston better to live in?
Kingston scores higher overall, though Bexleyheath may offer better affordability.
Is Bexleyheath cheaper than Kingston?
Bexleyheath is cheaper — average 1-bed rent is £1,250 vs £1,450 in Kingston, a saving of £200/month.
Which has better transport — Bexleyheath or Kingston?
Bexleyheath and Kingston score equally on transport (5/10). Bexleyheath is served by Bexleyheath. Kingston is served by Kingston.
Compare Bexleyheath with similar areas
Still deciding? Try the discovery tool
Enter your commute, salary and lifestyle preferences to get a personalised neighbourhood ranking.
Open the discovery tool →